From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [71.6.201.124] (helo=easi.embeddedalley.com) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Me0Vs-0003Sw-9L for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:48:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 19839 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2009 05:31:22 -0000 Received: from easi.embeddedalley.com (HELO localhost) (easi@71.6.201.124) by easi.embeddedalley.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2009 22:31:22 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:31:23 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20090820053123.GD4952@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20090814215138.GB31011@gmail.com> <20090815022703.GH14883@smtp.west.cox.net> <19c1b8a90908151021s67bbdd9fh52a07dce6d51ace8@mail.gmail.com> <20090817234049.GH2227@smtp.west.cox.net> <19c1b8a90908172329p55250179od552cd94fa4cbff5@mail.gmail.com> <20090818154440.GQ2227@smtp.west.cox.net> <20090818212827.GA26614@gmail.com> <20090818232002.GZ2227@smtp.west.cox.net> <19c1b8a90908181648nb43120bg978baa4ac0faa2cb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19c1b8a90908181648nb43120bg978baa4ac0faa2cb@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding eglibc versions of minimal and micro distro X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:48:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:48:20PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: [snip] > > So are we on the same page again, micro/minimal-uclibc can go away and > > micro/minimal can ?= LIBC? :) > > no. LIBC provides other packages too which is different for uclibc > its same for glibc and eglibc so having same for glibc and eglibc is ok but not > for uclibc You've lost me, again. What does uclibc.inc not set correct for uclibc? -- Tom Rini