Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding eglibc versions of minimal and micro distro
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:54:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090823075454.GA12300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19c1b8a90908201258s1d1ba49aice5020132e2e5ba0@mail.gmail.com>

On (20/08/09 12:58), Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Tom Rini<trini@embeddedalley.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:48:20PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> > So are we on the same page again, micro/minimal-uclibc can go away and
> >> > micro/minimal can ?= LIBC? :)
> >>
> >> no. LIBC provides other packages too which is different for uclibc
> >> its same for glibc and eglibc so having same for glibc and eglibc is ok but not
> >> for uclibc
> >
> > You've lost me, again.  What does uclibc.inc not set correct for uclibc?
> >
> 
> e.g.
> 
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libintl      = "proxy-libintl"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libiconv     = "libiconv"
> 
> but if we move these to sane-toolchain-uclibc inc then yes
> we could basically use LIBC knob with some little work

I have committed the change to switch defaulting to eglibc in minimal micro and
sane-toolchain. If you see issues yell at me. I will try to fix ASAP

On Tom's suggestion I also added necessary PREFERRED_PROVIDERS to
sane-toolchain-uclibc and now by selecting correct LIBC with distro
minimal and micro we can have a system built which means we do not
need the -uclibc versions of the minimal and micro distros. 

For now I have left then in there as it is. They will be deleted
if I dont here someone using them.

Thanks

-Khem




      reply	other threads:[~2009-08-23  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 21:51 [RFC] Adding eglibc versions of minimal and micro distro Khem Raj
2009-08-14 22:07 ` Phil Blundell
2009-08-14 23:21   ` Khem Raj
2009-08-15  2:27 ` Tom Rini
2009-08-15 17:21   ` Khem Raj
2009-08-16 19:06     ` Khem Raj
2009-08-16 20:33       ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-08-17 23:40     ` Tom Rini
2009-08-18  6:29       ` Khem Raj
2009-08-18 15:44         ` Tom Rini
2009-08-18 21:28           ` Khem Raj
2009-08-18 23:20             ` Tom Rini
2009-08-18 23:48               ` Khem Raj
2009-08-20  5:31                 ` Tom Rini
2009-08-20 19:58                   ` Khem Raj
2009-08-23  7:54                     ` Khem Raj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090823075454.GA12300@gmail.com \
    --to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox