From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nobga-0003sE-Rd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:03:50 +0100 Received: from tamarin.localnet (123-192-181-204.dynamic.kbronet.com.tw [123.192.181.204]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFCBE1B10C79 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:03:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:00:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33-rc8; KDE/4.4.1; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003081300.19058.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: samba-essential upgrade or remove? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:03:51 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, samba-essential is currently based on the 3.0.x series of samba that has reached end of life. Our current version is 3.0.20, the latest upstream is 3.0.37, the stable 3.5.x series was just opened... So what should we do? There is currently no in tree usage of samba-essential, should we drop it? z.