From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nr1Jh-0002LJ-KV for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:50:10 +0100 Received: from tamarin.localnet (123-192-181-204.dynamic.kbronet.com.tw [123.192.181.204]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A34F21B10C02 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:50:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:46:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33-rc8; KDE/4.4.1; i686; ; ) References: <201003081300.19058.holger+oe@freyther.de> <201003081351.35463.holger+oe@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: <201003081351.35463.holger+oe@freyther.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003150446.26284.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: samba-essential upgrade or remove? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:50:10 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Monday 08 March 2010 13:51:35 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Monday 08 March 2010 13:42:07 Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > > While I'm not using it atm., I recall that samba-essential was the only > > recipe that worked relatively painless when Matthias Hentges create it > > back then. > > Then please fix it. You will do a great service to our users. The following > CVEs are not addressed: > CVE-2009-2813, CVE-2009-2948, CVE-2009-2906, CVE-2009-1888, > CVE-2008-4314, CVE-2008-1105, CVE-2007-6015, CVS-2007-4572, CVE-2007-5398, > CVE-2007-2444, CVE-2007-2446, CVE-2007-2447, CVE-2007-0452, CVE-2007-0453, > CVE-2007-0454, CAN-2006-1059.. any update? Is anyone volunteering to update samba-essential or shall we remove it from the tree? I think we have a responsibility to our users that if we install a network daemon that we at least fix the known security issues with this one or remove it from our recipe collection... Opinions? z.