From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrCjo-0002nO-QZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:01:57 +0100 Received: from tamarin.localnet (123-192-181-204.dynamic.kbronet.com.tw [123.192.181.204]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2061B10C02 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:01:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:58:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33-rc8; KDE/4.4.1; i686; ; ) References: <201003081300.19058.holger+oe@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003151658.08401.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: samba-essential upgrade or remove? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:01:57 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Monday 15 March 2010 10:51:33 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > I don't think 1) is a realistic option, if we go with that, we should > > just redirect oe.org to buildroot.org and go home. > > Why is it not realistic. > Lots of driver code I get from commercial vendors, contain statements like > "this is sample code only, not intended for use in products, proceed > at own risk, bla bla bla". You are mixing two things again. One is warranty and of course our MIT license says that the stuff comes "as is" without warranty and such. The other is what do we want to try. I think we should folllow CVEs and have no known security issues in our default set (bitbake -s).