From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsjX1-0000wl-Hb for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:15:03 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BEA2C9B5 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:11:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KaOgkEjhUF6M for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:11:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xora-desktop.xora.org.uk (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 803C42C99A for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:11:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: by xora-desktop.xora.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2926E27AD8; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:12:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:12:20 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100319211220.GI2425@xora-desktop.xora.org.uk> References: <201003182212.31873.roman@khimov.ru> <201003190004.37865.roman@khimov.ru> <201003190023.36525.roman@khimov.ru> <201003200005.35468.roman@khimov.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201003200005.35468.roman@khimov.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.68.91.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Perl 5.10.1 and a bunch of modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:15:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:05:35AM +0300, Roman I Khimov wrote: > =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE=D1= =82 =D0=9F=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0 19 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=82= =D0=B0 2010 00:23:25 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 Roman I Khimov =D0=BD= =D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE=D1= =82 =D0=9F=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0 19 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=82= =D0=B0 2010 00:04:30 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 Roman I Khimov =D0=BD= =D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE= =D1=82 =D0=A7=D0=B5=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3 18 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=80=D1= =82=D0=B0 2010 23:47:01 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 Roman I Khimov=20 > =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > > No. You mean, this one? > > > > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=3Dca5f36ee6ad75= 6e1e5402 > > > >88 a5 6a504c1d8ecc7a3 > > > > > > > > Looks like a good thing to have, so if Richard will push it to OE= .dev I > > > > can do a rebase of my patchset. > > > > > > Actually, the better sequence is > > > * drop 5.8.4 and 5.8.7 > > > * bring in staging changes > > > * bring in 5.10.1 > > > > > > I'll prepare 5.8.4/5.8.7 removal patch. > >=20 > > Updated rik/perl-5.10 branch with removal patch, please ACK. >=20 > Tried to compile for arm, succeeded with perl, discovered and fixed som= e=20 > problems in modules. Updated the branch. >=20 > I think I need some ACK's for dusty old Perl versions removal and then=20 > Richard's Perl staging update could be merged better on top of that (CC= 'ing=20 > Richard) and than I'll update 5.10.1 to new staging and push the series= . At=20 > least, that's how I think it should be. If there are any problems with = staging=20 > update and it's not ready to be pushed in OE.dev, I think we can merge = 5.10.1=20 > as it is now. >=20 For removal of old perl versions Acked-by: Graeme Gregory