From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OK5ss-0006vG-SH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:34:49 +0200 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1636071fxm.6 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:30:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mUw1fVbcexIrIBB4BrdMoUh+XmxQXYiPrGVTY1vSBc0=; b=W1l8x4t/bVoseotYyTZOB+dZzEvyIvkipxCGwt173QnIP6oQw9nthMIYNvrBinIeaC P5Z4Di3fn7REJ1I9QmCen5P7uL82GOk18onGqr8R6lAfBQKdTjZIdw8kcJNVmVR40+Xd 6/ntFt6tRpwVRs5PbkQFKdmPJhVQ2fwSwOo3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=U20Fg9dX6YM7/Y66tEoRYnh2cB+nUanx9Rzs5Sqvbqca7DoGI0Pc7al1LLna6yCJn3 ubeGGFCjweUCSWUwBBP3c/wVqQWqvqEFFZGOIpswjWzbwX9Wn3oWXYahCr54Lh4/7YE2 ZvX7pHW27X3KB7qXdb2IvubEjLx0AUEVRxx3c= Received: by 10.223.26.69 with SMTP id d5mr9871533fac.20.1275553822965; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z12sm56386884fah.9.2010.06.03.01.30.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:30:11 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100603083011.GM16035@jama> References: <201006022351.38129.pieterg@gmx.com> <20100603043505.GJ16035@jama> <201006030915.57362.pieterg@gmx.com> <20100603073717.GK16035@jama> <1275552817.4657.32.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1275552817.4657.32.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: AUTOREV and SRCPV X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:34:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:13:37AM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > The other is when you change SRCREV in recipe without updating PV. Then > > SRCPV will give you newer PV which will upgrade resulting package on > > target. > > If it's just a question of getting the package upgraded on the target > then you can do that with PKGV; there's no need to fiddle with PV at > all. The only case where PV is important is where you need bitbake to > realise that the package needs to be rebuilt in the first (since the > SRCREVs aren't going to be sortable), Ah right, sure you need both PV and PKGV higher. > but I think that's already fixable > with strategic use of PREFERRED_VERSION and/or DEFAULT_PREFERENCE. How? Can you explain in more detail? Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa