From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-1.concepts.nl ([213.197.30.124]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKSaQ-0006oC-IR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:49:07 +0200 Received: from c3404277.ftth.concepts.nl ([195.64.66.119] helo=mx1.grimmerink.nl) by smtp-1.concepts.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKSWH-0004B8-5U for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:44:49 +0200 Received: from [10.9.0.12] (unknown [10.9.0.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.grimmerink.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D526A11A for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:44:45 +0200 (CEST) From: pieterg To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:44:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <201006022351.38129.pieterg@gmx.com> <201006041024.31712.pieterg@gmx.com> <1275640257.4657.84.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1275640257.4657.84.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201006041044.42032.pieterg@gmx.com> X-Concepts-MailScanner-Information: Please contact abuse@concepts.nl for more information X-Concepts-MailScanner-ID: 1OKSWH-0004B8-5U X-Concepts-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Concepts-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Concepts-MailScanner-From: pieterg@gmx.com X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.197.30.124 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: pieterg@gmx.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_FAIL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: AUTOREV and SRCPV X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:49:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 04 June 2010 10:30:57 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 10:24 +0200, pieterg wrote: > > I probably don't know enough about the bitbake internals to see how to > > fix my problem with that, could you please point me in the right > > direction? I think in case of AUTOREV I would still need some way to > > automatically include a sortable revision count in PKGV, so the actual > > problem would only move from PV to PKGV. > > That's correct: essentially it is just moving the SRCPV-equivalent thing > from PV to PKGV. But, PKGV only needs to be evaluated during the > do_package step, not at parse time, so you only incur the cost and risk > of running git rev-list (or whatever) for packages that you are actually > building rather than for all recipes in your source tree. I'm starting to see your point. That would really allow a much nicer AUTOREV implementation. But in that case I'm not getting away with a simple workaround I'm afraid... Rgds, Pieter