From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fallback4.mail.ru ([94.100.176.42]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OM5d3-0005mj-El for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:42:36 +0200 Received: from mx30.mail.ru (mx30.mail.ru [94.100.176.44]) by fallback4.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 56C8220D7DEA for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:05:43 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [77.51.33.209] (port=59923 helo=localhost) by mx30.mail.ru with asmtp id 1OM53M-000DW2-00 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:05:40 +0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:05:39 +0400 From: Dmitry Artamonow To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100608200539.GA2568@rainbow> References: <20100605204019.GA1403@jama> <20100608172005.GA28481@rainbow> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.100.176.42 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mad_soft@inbox.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Latest binutils-cross-2.20.1-r10.0 build issue with binutils-2.20.1 on gentoo host X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:42:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11:13 Tue 08 Jun , Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Artamonow w= rote: > > On 23:14 Mon 07 Jun =A0 =A0 , Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> > FYI: > >> > > >> > If you run into issue > >> > ar: can't set BFD default target to `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid= bfd target > >> > > >> > Like I did in: > >> > http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/601631/ > >> > > > Yup. I got this breakage too, only binutils-cross version is 2.18-r10= .2 > > and error is: > > ar: can't set BFD default target to `i686-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid bfd = target > > > > see for example http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/602258/ > > > > Though I didn't dig into problem deeply and simply workaround it by > > reverting 208ece17f76686e0faa44b2a9223fcadb692a991 > > But I'll gladly test any patches fixing the issue (whatever it is) in= a > > proper way. >=20 > proper way is to fix binutils on your host. Ahh, sorry - misread original Martin's post. So it's seems to be Gentoo-specific problem (yes, my OE is on Gentoo too). Still wondering why it worked before and how it's connected with adding "--enable-shared" in 208ece17f766. Weird, because it breaks on building static library. --=20 Best regards, Dmitry "MAD" Artamonow