From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMom2-0006Ek-UB for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:54:55 +0200 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so99808bwz.6 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fbYgu1Zg22+RxYD0bQ6MRqbM+4QBYMS2fs6Y5yD1/hk=; b=FyUocVItpeM5pA9gcRDUkSL+Z2BUxkNHCvctFUCxQfHF69a6gjihYQIztoQYY/o3DW uJfrXkdcBafVqQfN2ndPqkGP/UBEBUDW5nZVnQASAsYa/XAK36a27hCaN4Xq7h50oAQV 4F/C6SnivQFcRHCrXnaekkrvNcY3xK7ejTsUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ED+yCX70dbbt/JSDwWpElA6Ot6W0SjBdg7b7MOust9QLpCr9F6qqQQPatpSj2wzDZl KA16RApkYPUahyqpoeuhIqZvhZfM4RlZzxrsCtR8dwWXofcvu4Fc9Kqpj4U/mdFbuyHA mxnxQPXWJbL9sNK8l6x2bBzYwE2/WF5v40Fzg= Received: by 10.204.83.211 with SMTP id g19mr567278bkl.44.1276203029700; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-249-17.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.249.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z17sm1576282bkx.18.2010.06.10.13.50.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OMoi1-0000LR-0M; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:50:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:50:40 +0200 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100610205040.GW14941@mx.loc> References: <1276114963.4424.42.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1276199208-31929-2-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1276201371.13179.20.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:54:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:27:36PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> If you start factoring MACHINE_FEATURES into that kind of decision then, >> logically, the package needs to have PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE}. I don't >> think it would be a very good thing to start forcing packages down that >> path unnecessarily. This is unavoidable for certain special setups, isn't it. > > >Fair enough, that seems reasonable for this particular case. Now that you >bring it up, we adjust package arch to machine when we use a machine >specific file:// file, but maybe we need to teach it to check for references >to MACHINE_FEATURES or COMBINED_FEATURES, somehow. Both mmu and floatingpoint will need to look at COMBINED_FEATURES. At least for mmu vs. !mmu PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE} is unavoidable, no?