From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMpEs-00074y-Qs for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:24:41 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so44308fga.6 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:20:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m+qY0OWhmN2TKo9PXZR1D583PwE1+3edwXaQo+c44Wg=; b=bX9otl41lb4Iwvpb9HoybJkROhnu4pztbLsxUxQ+YofD3/1NiWmqHhzqQM61A1z0h1 GrYT1qIZRRNKN92ZZnktiVFtjTu0YEx/0MxoTrEpS6AvfJE5qrKAbFtnLu5JhQhKnWS+ dwqpSa8cULHyyH4s4Y3wifFWlCCVl4SBFaAEw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=GocMq8MLrgJLNXEhNkG4URmK6Qo64gexHXVp2mHRvlspz4FakaR0NU5Q1hRNMUUkON VnX3+kslEfJfraegI8wTedb8X59OxNKGnWI7qTn5EwF9ET2xVkvWTqK/H+JA0Ln9/+hB AkNcOqPRk3fhyURi79fO3lDcbrzTEydlmCMjU= Received: by 10.204.130.28 with SMTP id q28mr545677bks.177.1276204817733; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-249-17.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.249.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm1690725bkz.13.2010.06.10.14.20.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OMpAr-0000W2-E7; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:20:29 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:20:29 +0200 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20100610212029.GX14941@mx.loc> References: <1276114963.4424.42.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1276199208-31929-2-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1276201371.13179.20.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <20100610205040.GW14941@mx.loc> <1276203991.13179.33.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1276203991.13179.33.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.14.220.155 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:24:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:50 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Both mmu and floatingpoint will need to look at COMBINED_FEATURES. >> At least for mmu vs. !mmu PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE} is unavoidable, no? > >I think both of those are more of a distro than a machine feature, >really. I imagine that existing distros which are only interested in >(i.e. only build for) MMU-equipped targets will not be very thrilled if >their libc and/or other packages suddenly become MACHINE-specific. If the machine does not provide a choice to use or not use the MMU then it makes no sense to take that into account for the package arch (think bfin or i586 or certain coldfires/m68k), yes. If, OTOH, a machine supports it (let's say ppc) then there must at least be a nice way to distinguish ppc i would have hoped.