From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOuWX-0002gW-DC for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:27:30 +0200 Received: from p5b0334c5.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.52.197] helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1OOuS8-0001js-4R by authid with cram_md5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:23:02 +0200 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OOuS6-0007yw-C6 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:22:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:22:53 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100616152253.GD20969@excalibur.local> References: <1276625727-22991-1-git-send-email-stefan@datenfreihafen.org> <1276625727-22991-2-git-send-email-stefan@datenfreihafen.org> <20100616150958.GC20969@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH][STABLE 1/4] bug20/xorg.conf: update to use tslib driver for touchscreen input device. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:27:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:14, Koen Kooi wrote: > > On 16-06-10 17:09, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:46, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> On 15-06-10 20:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >>> From: Ken Gilmer > >>> > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ken Gilmer > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt > >> > >> Acked-by: Koen Kooi > > > > Just to make sure I understand the stable process correctly. As this patches > > don't touch anything in the core system I'm fine apply them to stable myself > > after fetching them with the ACK form patchwork, right? > > Not quite, you need 2 acks from maintainers of the stable branch (which > I think includes Marcin, Denys and me). > But given the low impact of these patches and the general stagnation of > stable/2009, I think it's safe to apply these. Hmm, I thought two ACKs are only needed for core changes. At least this is how I read the part in the wiki: http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Stable Types of changes * change touches core system (which is anything in tested images or * classes/) * change touches only machine which you maintain * change touches only your distro and and it builds * any new stuff which not touch tested stuff Changes of first type will require 2 Acks and one of them must be given by one of stable branch maintainers. Last type changes are new distros, machines, recipes/classes etc. I can wait for another ack if that makes people feel better. regards Stefan Schmidt