From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pv0-f175.google.com ([74.125.83.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORo7e-0003cM-GU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:15:28 +0200 Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so1050258pvg.6 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RvlAT+Y8n/CdQEm7JnCNVRVBo7rmN3mRvrXzlX/7xFo=; b=HKBaLvOowMlcG1Yk7w6meuKtA4Bp+jGwertxG3laayg75wmOhfJqOSdZxtQCHX+tdx J+Eds2cXg1+sa7ADANrxpiiGDAo+sXmuImD80Qwv4plxZOg2f+mGXMU8VKogaUzxO6cv bh8UIRJ+7r0b69pE/Wh1tIY+HQ8wDu6p05doc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NMmb+S8JVWWzknLym2DqQfyIn9if3XTtYERzFzIUhuQoC4AL8fcwdDIc8cgpKwWmxn jmQeqEoO5EjggHIIRICXSWLCpVbA+ynzOcv75OKflR35W5gOPqB/xYEXsSvm6YqYtzgg PS/zett9qB2C14Vf6osB7s9krZdtWB5bKSuJg= Received: by 10.115.66.30 with SMTP id t30mr9630723wak.161.1277392137279; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm52358263waa.15.2010.06.24.08.08.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:10:03 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100624151003.GA28292@gmail.com> References: <20100623172352.GC5535@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.83.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: introducing a new architecture/machine; policy ? (and a question) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:16:34 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:16:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (24/06/10 13:23), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/6/24 Koen Kooi : > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 23-06-10 22:04, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > > >> I can pin in sane-toolchain, but only a few distro's seem to use that. > >> For now I think it is probably best to have gcc-nios recipes and > >> define virtual/gcc in the machine configurations. (haven't really seen > >> objections to that, > > > > I object to that. Nios is no more special than avr32 or blackfin in this > > regard. > > objection noted. > btw: avr and bfin are supported gcc architectures, whereas nios2 isn't. well nios2 has patches which are not upstream fully same is true for avr and bfin too. > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel