From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTivG-0005x4-1c for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:04:55 +0200 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so63074fxm.6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mhvbVsvK9t0g8XaCSkFA88QTWc6HyK2wmdNxbVQzp7o=; b=tXSqmZo+6CR/ZtlrJHFcVzg4Ds4SqbkLeT92Chr8H19+RZlnHCbpDiO6hHaYeAVoFT 62UKjSMSZb20xEfALESFTvbmiz691Fk8czWlG2Cb5YWEun+0kkCW1k0qhVvBRX2iroPN EqJOlJlIt5U7r/4azdeeLQS2p+OPb8kodSx3g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=nl+QkjbjceRE0ny23sdMS6Y+NR7bF7Ta51Sl1paDb6Zlk7xSm/8mC0KEsBYycSKLUn 8+susQeCaPyBZ+lH6uIUB7WbmKbnByzz8sV02fjmHLHEhInA9ZSNcu4lsOpPyyS3rG3T y9HDxdz/zWDMY81AhvHMxIa9qU56m10TIAF2M= Received: by 10.223.119.133 with SMTP id z5mr6446652faq.58.1277848810924; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l26sm3098734fam.15.2010.06.29.15.00.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:59:20 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100629215920.GD12539@jama> References: <20100605204019.GA1403@jama> <20100608172005.GA28481@rainbow> <20100608200539.GA2568@rainbow> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Latest binutils-cross-2.20.1-r10.0 build issue with binutils-2.20.1 on gentoo host X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:04:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: > > On 11:13 Tue 08 Jun     , Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: > >> > On 23:14 Mon 07 Jun     , Martin Jansa wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> >> > FYI: > >> >> > > >> >> > If you run into issue > >> >> > ar: can't set BFD default target to `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid bfd target > >> >> > > >> >> > Like I did in: > >> >> > http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/601631/ > >> >> > > >> > Yup. I got this breakage too, only binutils-cross version is 2.18-r10.2 > >> > and error is: > >> > ar: can't set BFD default target to `i686-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid bfd target > >> > > >> > see for example http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/602258/ > >> > > >> > Though I didn't dig into problem deeply and simply workaround it by > >> > reverting 208ece17f76686e0faa44b2a9223fcadb692a991 > >> > But I'll gladly test any patches fixing the issue (whatever it is) in a > >> > proper way. > >> > >> proper way is to fix binutils on your host. > > > > Ahh, sorry - misread original Martin's post. So it's seems to be > > Gentoo-specific problem (yes, my OE is on Gentoo too). > > Still wondering why it worked before and how it's connected with adding > > "--enable-shared" in 208ece17f766. Weird, because it breaks on building > > static library. > > it is a latent problem in there which just gets exposed with this change. Just for reference there is gentoo bug I reported http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323319 now it's closed as INVALID which is not 100% right imho as that broken patch (broken only with multitarget is applied in ebuild) and --enable-plugins is task for eclass not upstream.. but you can fix it locally.. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com