From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTjXb-00049S-US for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:44:32 +0200 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so76152fxm.6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NgkuG8u057Ai7Vq6hG+yz52c6jaJ3Bjo43ZDwiSciPU=; b=sZJpAMozn1/E/Uan5uI86beSB9d5nmEz+2cI8dE+/93aVHOd6TnDaMPdR6qvT2eVPO DEXTItRjD3p+t1flJagD0KICNRqdlvCS7VRd2/ZcbjntHgqXhv6RoRGSBzoR3L7c7kcj icLwtAslVy+2yOX4h7W3or55JhS10s70QsO4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=FGGcTS773hQxrigafg/OAaoSbS6/+KaAEXszBs1yx4+LBA/6hrvE1TEk0EZ4B9PYHT QG52KFK3jFk0ShbHEzeqIUtvySw9+zjxbUn75tPziXDrLDO8dBS9j1WIQkpaZ5UTHrYB y5FFHChQN9FDD0v1RpQoibcNu52FZadvBmNFg= Received: by 10.223.5.81 with SMTP id 17mr6505553fau.42.1277851188786; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9sm19824545fav.18.2010.06.29.15.39.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:38:59 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100629223859.GE12539@jama> References: <933C8D2B-2A4E-46EE-A342-ED5EB3636F38@keylevel.com> <92233E3F-2CFC-4F88-A780-1A15D7D94A00@keylevel.com> <69E07E36-D08B-4CD2-9B79-EF876EE47C52@keylevel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <69E07E36-D08B-4CD2-9B79-EF876EE47C52@keylevel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: 'swapper' process using 100% cpu when system idle X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:44:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32:19PM +0100, Chris Tapp wrote: > >on .dev > >well look at the kernel recipe you want > >to go to and add > > > >DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_ = "1" > >you might have to provide defconfig also. > > > Thanks > > I'm getting 2.6.35-rc3 included in the build at the moment (for > 'linux'). I couldn't find a recipe for this and it took me a while > to work out that it was linux_git.bb that was getting used! > > This file has DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = -1. However, it seems as if none > of the other linux_x.y.z.bb files specify a value for my machine > (x86) and they all have a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE of -1. http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/html/recipes_defaultpreference.html The default preference (when no DEFAULT_PREFERENCE is specified) is zero. That's why I used only -1 when I added it. But if you have machine which has DEFAULT_PREFERENCE -1 in all other linux recipes (positive values are usualy assigned only for machines known to work) then you're right it will pull it. I'll decrease it to -2 with SRCREV bump I have in my queue.. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com