From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYkLQ-0007Ls-MG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:42 +0200 Received: from p5b034ad5.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.74.213] helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1OYkLN-0002Me-U2 by authid with cram_md5 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:40 +0200 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OYkLH-000193-Mr for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:28 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100713183628.GA1947@excalibur.local> References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:36:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 22:40, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > That all needs to be filled with more details, but it could be a start. Let me > know what you think. I have to say I expected more replies. Some blames here and there and maybe a discussion. To hot these days? :) More serious, I think it would be a good time now to discuss this. What experience did the stable maintainer made with stable/2009 so far? Is it worth doing it again? Maybe change the process? regards Stefan Schmidt