From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OeAc1-0005Iq-8I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:40:14 +0200 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so1431322fxm.6 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FfMSYgizNZiKK4zHXCCHRmvXxxQ8HRoH42Wqgar6l9U=; b=Wl+wvFKudJri6iRz3PAT1OjFzRowztE5S5yD5iYFIFBADmPzpTIU8z6Gi3YHW8QHCa OyZM3zbkuSyW7ZHRuI6ln5rM71nUBRg9yvJqziJcNldKdd7nyApcaO/f9UebpSAwdzf1 5ya8lJ5A8cVTuToGnpI9HuCmvTTq/ekQ3AaW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sYGZTIEQLpKLc0ON3ncNMqH2ohTk7/gOWtW6C0sU2PYyyFOQQaQ/wSg66PPj0sTsk9 x2d4NIR5vEpEXkgYO2CvMonUB833uiLm2b44eVl0IpE6TvuHDK8DF4kulIjRlVnQCrCE hQ/a5zqPKBGWVNun1t+n4PTz6VgnByvVGHM+M= Received: by 10.223.123.79 with SMTP id o15mr9679554far.12.1280338794369; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-241-5.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.241.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d15sm1833028faa.1.2010.07.28.10.39.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OeAbZ-0006qg-SS; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:39:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:39:45 +0200 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100728173945.GD19135@mx.loc> References: <20100716213929.GI23169@mx.loc> <1280337265-25582-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] gcc-cross: fix PV and make it compile X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:40:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:16:05PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On 28-07-10 19:14, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> -PV = "4.6+svnr${SRCPV}" >> +PR = "4.6+svnr${SRCPV}" > >NAK, PV = "4.6+svnr${SRCPV}" is the right thing to do ok what should i do then? I want to use the svn version of gcc regardless of it being called "1.2.3-svn" or "5.0.0-svn" so i put this into my local.conf: #PREFERRED_GCC_VERSION = "4.4.4" PREFERRED_GCC_VERSION = "svn" But that obviously doesn't work with a PV of "4.6+svnr${SRCPV}" like current git has. I made up that "svn" intuitively, with the following reasoning: i'm using the subversion version (_version_, hence PV) with an arbitrary revision as Package Release that will sort correctly iff a 4.6.0 release would be made. Now how am i supposed to pick "svn" if not by using "svn"? thanks for clarification,