Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 06:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
>>>> 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
>>>>
>>>> And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
>>>
>>>    come on, koen, that last part was uncalled for.  i specifically
>>> stated that i hadn't run the build yet, i just wanted to know if there
>>> were any *known* issues for my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 platform.
>>>
>>>    given that you certainly have *legitimate* reasons to criticize some
>>> of my posts here, you don't need to make stuff up.
>>
>> You could also check tinderbox.openembedded.org for build results and
>> it will help you determine the state of stuff you are interested in.
>
> Until the server situation gets sorted out, tinderbox may not be available 
> at all times.

Plus, tinderbox has been acting up lately, even before the server failure (or 
was it actually related?) - in the past month or two there were intermittent 
messages about it being unavailable during the build (going up and down all 
the time), resulting in unfinished stats...

-- 
Denys