From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol5Zc-0004f0-Va for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:42:21 +0200 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3246913fxm.6 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=E70AdTIyv2MWauV4uG/iN5jOPzCjWKa4FmTgA+C4JvM=; b=qT4skGjdKq0RIDcbKQTh/0WqO+fSTEJahk0rV5h6cZXDYXilQ53RcWNuZiA3x2plAm 1vojJ44znauioEWuVuEJzufNBmRKOjSEh2Q/vaP2CkM0oWoL+bI2WFpzAZWd59852x7B qHuhX6AjffK7gGLvW5yNtaO7YjtAEKuxnEISs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LSlzgWF15IJSFxQo+rR05ANqOo4zzcOW5DDYZeKT0kTaL99z+8fnjSUXAU8psSmRCa qnssuUCKq3YoCz2yrNsln4qFcprALhrClmzB4ut3JK+4VpHHC+BXAqAkNXOwkWFD/0m8 lUI+0ySTj/iSevLqLseIhLljOKNqaxKvI+UMA= Received: by 10.223.103.148 with SMTP id k20mr5526345fao.101.1281987723858; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm2213607fak.33.2010.08.16.12.42.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:42:16 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100816194216.GH10076@jama> References: <1281972620-7317-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: xorg recipes cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:42:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/8/16 Martin Jansa : > > Hi, > > > > all distributions are now using > > preferred-xorg-versions-X11R7.5.inc or > > preferred-xorg-versions-live.inc or > > no preferred-xorg-versions*.inc at all > > > > So we can remove some older versions not pinned in those 2 > > to make future maintanance of xorg-* dirs a bit easier. > > > > As this is really easy to test (if you apply all 9 and build your > > favourite target again, no xorg package should be rebuilt - version changed), > > please test and ACK or don't scream later that you had some strange version > > preferred from local.conf. > > I could not test, as patch 2 is not on patchwork (and retrieving them > from gmail is somewhat tricky) I'm checking why :/ only clue is bitbake@jama ~/oe $ git send-email 0002-xorg-lib-move-older-not-pinned-versions-to-obsolete-.patch The following files are 8bit, but do not declare a Content-Transfer-Encoding. 0002-xorg-lib-move-older-not-pinned-versions-to-obsolete-.patch Which 8bit encoding should I declare [UTF-8]? > Do we indeed want to move this to obsolete? Is there a point in > retaining it? Why not just rm them (they are still in git) > Or do we want obsolete to become the graveyard of old recipes? I usually move it to obsolete where it's not parsed if you have 'standard' BBFILES := "/OE/dev/recipes/*/*.bb" and if nobody screams then I'll remove whole obsolete/xorg dir after a while. I know it's SCM and I can look to every version in history, but while it's still in obsolete it's faster to call just diff if I need to check what changed since previous version. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com