From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P381i-0004eW-36 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:57:54 +0200 Received: from guest190.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de ([134.169.35.190] helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1P381O-0003gj-R2 by authid with cram_md5 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:57:37 +0200 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P381N-0005X2-7B for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:57:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:57:32 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20101005135732.GE3517@excalibur.local> References: <20101005123257.GD3517@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: testing 2010-10-04 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:57:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:28, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 05-10-10 14:32, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 14:05, Cliff Brake wrote: > >> Testing run from last week: > >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tag/?id=testing_2010-09-27 > >> > >> testing-next is updated and ready for clean builds: > >> http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Testing > > > > Openjdk-6 build fails on cacao: > > http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/public/logs/task/8408323.txt > > Openjdk fails in a lot of ways. Building it is a lottery. When changing > nothing (host system and OE) I can do 2 builds from scratch and have one > building openjdk and the other will fail. Or hang in icedtea compilation > taking 0% cpu. It was the first fail for all testing-next builds that have been done until now. I agree that building it is not as stable as I would like it, but it is also not as bad as described. The only problem i have been run into for a long time is a segfault of the host javavm when bringing up other packages. Restarting the build always gaves me a working image. > So openjdk is not a good measure of passing judgement over a branch. It failed in 1 out of 7 testing cycles for now. Not that bad imho. Surely it gives no idea of the overall usability of a certain branch, but thats why we have more images and distros to cover up more areas. regards Stefan Schmidt