From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] busybox: fix udhcp check for NFS rootfs for new style /proc/mounts
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:26:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224032623.GA17536@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D65C99F.5060909@opendreambox.org>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:59:43AM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hello Denys,
>
> On 02/24/2011 02:31 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > diff --git a/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch b/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..46aaab9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +diff -uNr busybox-1.13.2.orig/examples/udhcp/simple.script busybox-1.13.2/examples/udhcp/simple.script
> > +--- busybox-1.13.2.orig/examples/udhcp/simple.script 2011-02-23 00:30:32.000000000 -0500
> > ++++ busybox-1.13.2/examples/udhcp/simple.script 2011-02-23 17:05:37.873381763 -0500
> > +@@ -10,7 +10,12 @@
> > +
> > + # return 0 if root is mounted on a network filesystem
> > + root_is_nfs() {
> > ++ # old style mounts
> > + grep -qe '^/dev/root.*\(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) .*' /proc/mounts
> > ++ if ! $? ; then
> > ++ # new style mounts
> > ++ grep -qe '^.*:.* / \(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) .*' /proc/mounts
> > ++ fi
>
> Would "grep -qe '^\S\+ / \(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) ' /proc/mounts" work
> for both cases?
Andreas,
As I mentioned in the patch description:
* The regexp in grep can be simplified and rolled into one, but may become
less strict...
So, it's definitely possible, but I was worried the regexp would become too
loose and return false positives. Plus, I'm not sure how \S\+ would work on
spaces in the pathname, such as My\ Documents.
> > diff --git a/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc b/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > index 7623944..aefa57f 100644
> > --- a/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > +++ b/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> > file://fdisk_nios2.patch \
> > file://udhcpscript.patch \
> > file://udhcpc-fix-nfsroot.patch \
> > + file://udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch \
>
> Should the two patches above be merged into a single patch?
That can be done, if people feel strongly about it...
--
Denys
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 1:31 [PATCH] busybox: fix udhcp check for NFS rootfs for new style /proc/mounts Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-02-24 2:59 ` Khem Raj
2011-02-24 2:59 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-02-24 3:26 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110224032623.GA17536@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox