From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again.
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:08:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110903070828.GL3634@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315000152.6109.14.camel@mattotaupa>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> > Op 02-09-11 21:29, Andreas Müller schreef:
> > > On Friday, September 02, 2011 08:48:38 PM Phil Blundell wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > >>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> > >>>> I do find the split useful...
> > >>>
> > >>> Hmm, could you please elaborate?
> > >>
> > >> Not that I'm Richard, but I do find the split useful as well.
> > >> Personally I am much less interested in the traffic on the oe-devel
> > >> list and I often ignore that one; I've been somewhat tempted to just
> > >> unsubscribe altogether since there doesn't appear to be all that much
> > >> of value (to me) going on there.
> >
> > > I would even prefer having additional meta-oe list separated from
> > > oe-dev.
> >
> > If there's enough need for it, that can get arranged.
>
> Why should that be needed? Maybe proposals could be explained and backed
> up with arguments for a discussion.
I don't care if it's all in one list or N > 2 separate lists because
I'll be subscribed to all and filter will merge all those e-mails to one
folder anyways..
But I see your point that it's harder to decide to which list(s) someone
should send his question..
Regards,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-03 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 11:25 Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again Paul Menzel
2011-09-02 13:05 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-09-02 13:19 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-09-02 13:23 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-09-02 13:33 ` Koen Kooi
2011-09-02 13:53 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-09-02 16:47 ` Richard Purdie
2011-09-02 17:35 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-09-02 17:45 ` Richard Purdie
2011-09-03 17:36 ` Detlef Vollmann
2011-09-02 15:21 ` Paul Menzel
2011-09-02 17:00 ` Richard Purdie
2011-09-02 17:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-09-02 20:18 ` Paul Menzel
2011-09-02 20:51 ` Andreas Müller
2011-09-02 18:48 ` Phil Blundell
2011-09-02 19:29 ` Andreas Müller
2011-09-02 21:34 ` Koen Kooi
2011-09-02 21:49 ` Paul Menzel
2011-09-03 7:08 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2011-09-03 7:30 ` Eric Bénard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110903070828.GL3634@jama.jama.net \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox