Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][V2 0/4] libnl and iw updates to make networkmanager work
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:47:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111230847.07434.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jafkln$of4$1@dough.gmane.org>

On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 08:57:43 AM Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 22-11-11 01:44, Andreas Müller schreef:
> > On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:49:20 AM Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> On Monday, November 21, 2011 11:11:22 PM Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> Op 21-11-11 20:53, Andreas Müller schreef:
> >>>> V1 -> V2: networkmanager bump PR
> >>>> 
> >>>> Note: It might be required to rebuild wpa-supplicant coming from
> >>>> oe-core.
> >>> 
> >>> I'll apply this set tomorrow if there are no comments, but could you
> >>> also push libnl3 into oe-core and then bump PR for wpa-supplicant? If
> >>> not, could you add a wpa-supplicant bbappend that simply does PR_INC
> >>> = 1 (or PRINC, I forget) ?
> >> 
> >> how about:
> >> 
> >> 1st step: I'll send V3 in a few minutes with wpa-supplicant PR bump.
> >> 
> >> 2nd step: * libnl-3 -> oe-core and remove workarounds for
> >> wpa-supplicant (symlink include/lib) * modify wpa-supplicant so that it
> >> works with libnl-3 without workarounds & PR bump +2 * iw -> oe-core?
> >> 
> >> Since I am under pressure in my first life, 2nd step may take a few
> >> days.
> >> 
> >> What do you think?
> > 
> > Sorry for spamming but: how about 2nd step only?
> 
> I'm fine with either, but since you sent a v3 already, do you want me to
> apply it?
> 
It seems no pressure on networkmanager issue, so I would prefer the cleaner oe-
core solution and ignore these patches.

Andreas



      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-23  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 19:53 [meta-oe][V2 0/4] libnl and iw updates to make networkmanager work Andreas Müller
2011-11-21 19:53 ` [meta-oe][V2 1/4] iw: update to 3.2 Andreas Müller
2011-11-21 19:53 ` [meta-oe][V2 2/4] libnl: add 3.23 Andreas Müller
2011-11-21 19:53 ` [meta-oe][V2 3/4] networkmanager: bump PR to force rebuild with libnl 3.23 Andreas Müller
2011-11-21 19:53 ` [meta-oe][V2 4/4] libnl1: remove Andreas Müller
2011-11-21 22:11 ` [meta-oe][V2 0/4] libnl and iw updates to make networkmanager work Koen Kooi
2011-11-21 23:49   ` Andreas Müller
2011-11-22  0:44     ` Andreas Müller
2011-11-22  7:57       ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-23  7:47         ` Andreas Müller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201111230847.07434.schnitzeltony@gmx.de \
    --to=schnitzeltony@gmx.de \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox