From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvGUR-0007EG-5j for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:04:30 +0100 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rl6so417852pac.29 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:49:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/f5LntFKGbkGOucVmp/+pe0i8+W2Xi+IenhcgSV+kGA=; b=SFjqUm3yZVnFwKaMz84Djyv6JmFtO8OLJ17fI9ANmPUsCebYgDg8uSgdH/iPJSXB7e BC6sdaboTdTow9sc7c64Y4tdUdUg0wDbKEmIqJyCYa3z/p0Ty3yOZ9Fqf+3yo9fMjtSZ JGjJadY786GUVC+sd5UDUKgwIpL354rgIQthc1Dtq60er8Z68NdTXJQUaa7t7SyL4S0+ KMD6bowtmsntzYfu5N0SP6hRpZOjYP9bmjKkWJSjWC2GA6i362iJMB1q16Au2+Go70kP xfbTftJYSeXLdgIqnZEdmJyCphWVY0zWLM2fNSUkkJsEUTKvmdERknrnJO5G898qIl19 SvhA== X-Received: by 10.68.254.137 with SMTP id ai9mr266921955pbd.21.1358293741283; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm11703518pax.28.2013.01.15.15.48.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:49:02 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20130115234902.GC3002@jama> References: <3145293.jEgb7vZ7zI@helios> <20121213232058.GA5567@jama.jama.net> <20121214110507.GB8699@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121214110507.GB8699@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Archived patchwork entries Was: OE-Classic patches in patchwork X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:04:31 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 42709 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD" Content-Disposition: inline --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:05:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:20:58AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:11:22PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > Hi all, > > >=20 > > > There is a significant volume of patches in the OE patchwork [1] that= are=20 > > > intended to apply to OE-Classic. Apart from the 2011.3-maintenance br= anch, OE- > > > Classic is no longer maintained in favour of OE-Core + layers, so the= question=20 > > > is what should we do with these patches? At the moment I'm thinking w= e should=20 > > > just mark them as "archived" so that they disappear from the queue; p= eople can=20 > > > still get access to them if needed. > > >=20 > > > Thoughts? > >=20 > > There is also 70 patches from chase maupin just updating LICENSE to > > contain also version. > >=20 > > I'm not using oe-classic anymore, but I believe he prepared them > > carefully and it's worth merging. > >=20 > > I'll create bundle from it and apply it tomorrow if nobody objects. >=20 > Can we fix patchwork to show bundles marked as public to public users? >=20 > I've few bundles > Name Project Public Link Patches Download Delete > in-test oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/in-test/ 21 =09 > oe-classic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic/ 61= =09 > oe-classic-lic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic= -lic/ 70 =09 > 2011.03-maintenance oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/2011.0= 3-maintenance/ 1 =09 > denzil oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/denzil/ 6 =09 > danny oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/danny/ 5 =09 > meta-handheld oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handhel= d/ 1 =09 > meta-java oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-java/ 15 = =09 > meta-opie oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/ 1 =09 >=20 > But without sharing link to bundle, nobody will find it (AFAIK) maybe > there is newer version of Patchwork which shows public bundles > somewhere? >=20 > oe-classic bundle is now marked as archived - so not listed by default. > oe-classic-lic also marked as archived and I'll apply it later today. >=20 > It would be great if we agree to mark patches as archived when they get a= ssigned=20 > to some bundle to keep main patchwork list relatively clean and layer/rel= ease=20 > maintainers can still see all patches with "New" state in corresponding b= undle. >=20 > I've also marked some patches with review comments without reply as > "Changes requested" + archived. Pity that some patches had rather > trivial issues, but submitter never responded with v2.. >=20 > And there were some patches for oe-core already applied in oe-core.. so > marked as "Not applicable" + archived. Andrea just asked about this, so if someone missed this information: There are some bundles: 2011.03-maintenance oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/2011.03-= maintenance/ 1 =09 danny oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/danny/ 9 =09 denzil oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/denzil/ 10 =09 in-test oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/in-test/ 161 =09 meta-browser oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-browser/ = 7 =09 meta-handheld oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handheld/= 2 =09 meta-initramfs oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-initramf= s/ 1 =09 meta-java oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-java/ 15 = =09 meta-kde oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-kde/ 1 =09 meta-networking oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-network= ing/ 12 =09 meta-opie oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/ 2 =09 meta-systemd oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-systemd/ = 25 =09 meta-webserver oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-webserve= r/ 2 =09 oe-classic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic/ 62 = =09 oe-classic-lic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic-li= c/ 70 =09 I'm adding patches to right bundle when I'm sorting patches to=20 test them on jenkins (in-test bundle, contrib/jansa/in-test branch). In the process I'm marking them as "Archived" (to see what's not sorted in = main page),=20 but because their state stays "New" you can still find them in bundles, e.g. http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-webserver/?archive=3Dboth Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlD16u4ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByzHwCgljtjd6+JnTp/YWHa62NY9W3j G+gAnivdhLna6OUpEmNRPdv+7aHJs3Vl =XBpC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD--