[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] traceroute: Remove bashisms] On 13.01.18 (Fri 15:17) Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:53:01AM -0500, Joe MacDonald wrote: > > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] traceroute: Remove bashisms] On 12.12.21 (Fri 22:02) Little, Morgan wrote: > > > > > On 12/21/2012 04:37 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Morgan Little > > > > wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Morgan Little > > > >> --- > > > >> meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb | 6 ++---- > > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > >> > > > >> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb > > > >> index 719d9fb..d855c67 100644 > > > >> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb > > > >> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb > > > >> @@ -32,10 +32,8 @@ do_install() { > > > >> > > > >> install -d ${D}${mandir} > > > >> install -p -m644 ${PN}/${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir} > > > >> - pushd ${D}${mandir} > > > >> - ln -s ${PN}.8 ${PN}6.8 > > > >> - ln -s ${PN}.8 tcptraceroute.8 > > > >> - popd > > > >> + ln -s ${D}${mandir}${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}${PN}6.8 > > > >> + ln -s ${D}${mandir}${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}tcptraceroute.8 > > > > > > > > Thanks for quick reply and fix, but I think this should be: > > > >> + ln -s ${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/${PN}6.8 > > > >> + ln -s ${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/tcptraceroute.8 > > > > > > > > ${D} path won't be valid on target and missing slash after mandir > > > It looks like it should be. Thank you for noticing that. > > > > Fixed. That one's easy. > > Great, thanks I'll reenable it in world build when it's pushed. Just pushed. Thanks for the reminder, Martin. -J. > > > > > > > > > And is there something referencing those man pages with different > > > > name? Or why are those symlinks provided? > > > I provided them because I was basing the do_install step off of the .spec file the Fedora uses in their RPM file. It does a similar symlink step. I believe that is can be removed. > > > > So, as far as I can tell, the links are provided to support > > /etc/alternatives/ versions of the manpages in case you've got an > > alternative implementation of traceroute/traceroute6/etc. on your > > system. Unless you think the links are adding unnecessary clutter, I'm > > inclined to leave them even though I honestly have never installed an > > alternative traceroute and never looked into why I might want to. > > I don't mind if they stay. (I'm not using traceroute on my targets). > > > -J. > > > > > > > > //Morgan > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > > -- > > -Joe MacDonald. > > :wq > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > -- -Joe MacDonald. :wq