From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe-meta-systemd 4/5] pointercal-xinput: remove
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:25:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130206152529.GA3271@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbNGRR9isWgLJmRL3thvhkFhirwLR2YqoXfrHPtgMqOHrYQBw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1437 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:12:50PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:18:42PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> Calibration values are stored now in /etc/xorg.conf.d/99-<device>.conf. After
> >
> > So the plan to replace pointercal-xinput in BSP layers
> > is to convert pointercal.xinput files to 99-<device>.conf files provided
> > by xserver-xf86-conf bbappend?
> I would have appended it to xinput-calibrator because that's where the
> configuration files are used. I can put them also to xserver-xf86-conf
> bbappend - have no strong opinion here.
xinput-calibrator does not need to be MACHINE_ARCH, that's why they were
in separate pointercal-xinput before.
xserver-xf86-config on other hand is usually MACHINE_ARCH so it would be
better to add them there.
Or create new recipe for them and RDEPEND it from xinput-calibrator...
> > And do you have some script to convert them or do you convert them
> > manually?
> >
> I wanted to convert them manually but a script is more reliable - will
> do that next week.
>
> Andreas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-06 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 22:18 [meta-oe-meta-systemd 0/5] xinput-calibrator rework Andreas Müller
2013-02-05 22:18 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 1/5] xinput-calibrator: update to latest git commit Andreas Müller
2013-02-05 22:18 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 2/5] xinput-calibrator: Add --output-filename to store calibration to file Andreas Müller
2013-02-05 22:18 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 3/5] xinput-calibrator: rework Andreas Müller
2013-02-05 22:18 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 4/5] pointercal-xinput: remove Andreas Müller
2013-02-06 14:48 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-06 15:12 ` Andreas Müller
2013-02-06 15:25 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-02-06 15:45 ` Andreas Müller
2013-02-07 10:01 ` Koen Kooi
2013-02-08 22:11 ` Andreas Müller
2013-02-05 22:18 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 5/5] xinput-calibrator: do not RDEPEND xterm Andreas Müller
2013-02-07 10:08 ` Koen Kooi
2013-02-07 10:06 ` [meta-oe-meta-systemd 0/5] xinput-calibrator rework Koen Kooi
2013-02-08 22:10 ` Andreas Müller
2013-02-14 9:41 ` Andreas Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130206152529.GA3271@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox