From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: "koen@dominion.thruhere.net" <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
"otavio@ossystems.com.br" <otavio@ossystems.com.br>,
"enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de"
<enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
Subject: Re: meta-systemd future vote Was: [meta-systemd][PATCH 1/2] Delete systemd class.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412170255.GS2477@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1srFP+kbnqcCfM_z6U0w8wVWpZsqRj+ciHoo=o3t=X+8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3099 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:51:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:50:41PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:25:34AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>> > >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > good old meta-systemd should now parse again,
> >>> > Thanks - will come back to test HEADs soon.
> >>>
> >>> But be aware that I've fixed only parsing of avahi and wpa-supplicant.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't tested it properly in runtime because my upgrade path is a bit
> >>> broken (because I was building images with khem's patches for a while to
> >>> test other stuff) and even clean build with failed to boot with
> >>> qemux86-64 and I don't have time to debug it now.
> >>>
> >>> > > I wont apply this 2 commits
> >>> > > until systemd discussion in oe-core is finished and future of
> >>> > > meta-systemd decided.
> >>> > >
> >>> > After systemd regression is worked around yocto 1.4 release regression
> >>> > is knocking at the door...
> >>>
> >>> yes :/
> >>>
> >>> If we need to maintain meta-systemd bbappends for upgrade path we can
> >>> also maintain them with PN-systemd packages and good old systemd
> bbclass.
> >>
> >> Khem pinged me about this patch, so here are my thoughts:
> >>
> >> PN-systemd discussion in oe-core haven't moved a bit since this patch
> >> was proposed, I think we have 2-3 options, lets vote about meta-systemd
> future.
> >>
> >> 1) keep PN-systemd separation in meta-systemd and fixup .bbappends to
> >> resolve issues created by oe-core (I've fixed some issues, but still a
> >> lot of issues in postinst/postrm/prerm scripts when both inits are
> >> sharing the same PN)
> >>
> >> 2) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and provide upgrade path
> >> from PN-systemd to PN (mostly done by these 2 commits from khem).
> >>
> >> 3) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and upgrade path (there are
> >> many issues in other parts of oe-core, so upgrade path from danny to
> >> dylan doesn't look usable.
> >>
> >> A) migrate existing .bbappends to their recipes to .bb files and
> >> remove this layer. Any volunteer for that?
> >>
> >> My vote: 3) + A) later in 1.5
> > A bit off-topic and mentioned here & there: I am working on
> > network-manager(-applet) 0.9.8.0 update and xinput-calibrator. I could
> > add 3) + A) for them if agreed. Hope to send them beginning of next
> > week.
> >
>
> Sure I see no problem
OK, all systemd related changes should be now in master.
I'll do A) for meta-efl.
If someone starts working on A) for some other recipes, please write reply
here so that we don't duplicate work.
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-13 17:25 [meta-systemd][PATCH 1/2] Delete systemd class Khem Raj
2013-02-13 17:25 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH 2/2] meta-systemd: Append ${PN} to SYSTEMD_SERVICE Khem Raj
2013-02-14 3:01 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-15 18:34 ` Khem Raj
2013-02-14 7:45 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-15 18:39 ` Khem Raj
2013-04-13 14:56 ` Martin Jansa
2013-03-05 22:18 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH 1/2] Delete systemd class Martin Jansa
2013-03-05 22:50 ` Andreas Müller
2013-03-05 22:59 ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-09 20:01 ` meta-systemd future vote Was: " Martin Jansa
2013-04-09 20:06 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-09 20:08 ` Koen Kooi
2013-04-10 11:06 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-10 21:17 ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-11 9:59 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-10 11:39 ` Andreas Müller
2013-04-10 14:55 ` Khem Raj
2013-04-11 0:12 ` Andreas Müller
2013-04-11 0:51 ` Khem Raj
2013-04-12 17:02 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-04-13 11:29 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130412170255.GS2477@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox