From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3586A499 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7C2E4B0064; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:33:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:33:13 +0200 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20130528113313.39eb5f68@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <20130528093013.GF3192@jama> References: <1369698233-4500-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <1369698233-4500-8-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20130528084655.GB3192@jama> <20130528105056.62ea3b76@e6520eb> <20130528092518.GE3192@jama> <20130528112724.32aa801d@e6520eb> <20130528093013.GF3192@jama> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-qt5][PATCH 8/8] qtbase: add option to enable tslib support X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:33:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Tue, 28 May 2013 11:30:13 +0200, Martin Jansa a =C3=A9crit : > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:27:24AM +0200, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > > Le Tue, 28 May 2013 11:25:18 +0200, > > Martin Jansa a =C3=A9crit : > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50:56AM +0200, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > > > > true do you want a v2 ? > > >=20 > > > No, I've already added it and merged it :) > > >=20 > > perfect. > >=20 > > > Normally I would take longer for testing it, but I know about other > > > people starting to work on 5.0.2 so I wanted them to start with your > > > fixes included. > > >=20 > > FWIW all my tests were done with you patch > > e7a477a171bf0560939196eb7ebe8e0b05061072 applied so maybe it's > > interesting to also apply it. >=20 > But that will require to abandon 5.0.0 and 5.0.1, well I can at least > update that pull request to remove 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 together with this > SRCREV bump. >=20 maybe you can create a dylan branch with 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 and switch master to 5.0.2 ? Eric