Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-qt5] why does Qt5 build with ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm"
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:56:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140218065625.GG4067@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ86T=XEkEEMn-Tu=Ja4-1C5o=Ur7LdnsoN-RYskz_W_V0t2Rw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1761 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:33:10PM -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:46:23PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:27:51PM -0700, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> >> > hi,
> >> >
> >> > does anybody know why in Qt5/qtbase.inc, we have:
> >> >
> >> > ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm"
> >> >
> >> > Could it be an a low hanging fruit from the past? e.g. before
> >> > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-16402 or
> >> > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/a3bd9d4c0f3d9e80dbe35bd88649b245dca5f410?
> >>
> >> Hmm, I would assume that's here from 4.8 days, although I haven't tried
> >> dropping that line for latest Qt5... Would make sense to do some more testing.
> >>
> >> > as a matter of fact, for our project Qt5 (and QtWebkit) are building
> >> > (and working fine) when built with Thumb2, outside of OE. Also using
> >> > ARM instruction set instead of Thumb2 enforces Webkit to use the ARM
> >> > version of the javascript JIT, while the Thumb2 JIT engine seems to
> >> > work a lot better in our testing...
> >>
> >> Seems like worth the effort to re-test the need for that setting. Unless
> >> someone else has tried it already and found out the issue is still there
> >
> > IIRC it was failing to build for armv4t (at least with 5.0.0) if someone
> > tests that armv4t builds with 5.2.*, I'll accept the patch.
> 
> With ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET forced to thumb I'm able to build qtbase
> 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 tuned for both armv4t and cortexa9thf-neon.

Cool, can you please send the patch removing ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET?

Thanks

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-17 21:27 [meta-qt5] why does Qt5 build with ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" Nicolas Dechesne
2014-02-17 21:46 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2014-02-17 23:03   ` Martin Jansa
2014-02-18  5:33     ` Andre McCurdy
2014-02-18  6:56       ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2014-02-18  8:01         ` [meta-qt5][PATCH] qtbase.inc: don't force ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET to arm Andre McCurdy
2014-02-17 22:44 ` [meta-qt5] why does Qt5 build with ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140218065625.GG4067@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox