Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:40:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140723144002.GF22875@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407222013280.24982@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4161 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:14:32PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>

Applying: Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
error: patch failed: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf:4
error: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments

Can you please rebase and resend?

> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> index 64a0a44..bfecb8c 100644
> --- a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
>  # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
>  # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
>  # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
>  # not matter.
> 
> diff --git a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> index 2a5a428..9d7a60a 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
>  # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
>  # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
>  # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
>  # not matter.
> 
> diff --git a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> index f3fc45d..d8faf21 100644
> --- a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
>  # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
>  # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
>  # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
>  # not matter.
> 
> diff --git a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> index ca81eb1..9289a8f 100644
> --- a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
>  # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
>  # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
>  # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
>  # not matter.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>                         http://crashcourse.ca
> 
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-23 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23  0:14 [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-23 14:40 ` Martin Jansa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140723144002.GF22875@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox