From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCHv2] modphp, xdebug: blacklist because of conflict with php
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:25:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007152508.GD12322@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1801470.RIdAKMambK@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2780 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:39:34AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2014 06:53:17 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta-webserver/recipes-php/modphp/modphp5.inc | 3 +++
> > meta-webserver/recipes-php/xdebug/xdebug_2.2.5.bb | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta-webserver/recipes-php/modphp/modphp5.inc
> > b/meta-webserver/recipes-php/modphp/modphp5.inc index 6932429..8707950
> > 100644
> > --- a/meta-webserver/recipes-php/modphp/modphp5.inc
> > +++ b/meta-webserver/recipes-php/modphp/modphp5.inc
> > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/php-${PV}"
> >
> > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=52dd90569008fee5bcdbb22d945b1108"
> >
> > +PNBLACKLIST[modphp] = "CONFLICT: 466 header files conflict with php"
> > +# e.g. sysroots/qemux86-64/usr/include/php/main/win95nt.h
> > +
>
> I'm sorry, but we are not going to blacklist this recipe for everyone. I
> appreciate that stricter tests mean these can't be built side-by-side, that's
> just unfortunate and something we will have to live with for now.
It was motivated by discussion with RP and Ross on #yocto.
23:52:26 < JaMa|Off> RP: would it make sense to change populate-sysroot conflicts to use package_qa_handle_error function so it would be fatal QA error (by default) with option to disable it?
23:53:31 < JaMa|Off> RP: I think part of this problem was that normal bb.warn messages are less visible than QA messages (which are also collected in qa.log) so easy to check after the build
23:55:49 < RP> JaMa|Off: To be honest, I don't want people to turn that on off. The issues are too nasty
23:56:42 < RP> s/on/one/
23:56:46 < JaMa|Off> OK, fair enough, I agree it's nasty
23:57:32 < JaMa|Off> it's last 6 failures in world builds (after including all my pending fixes), I've sent the list earlier today
23:57:45 < RP> JaMa|Off: if it stops there and then, the issue can usually be recovered. If you continue past that you no longer know what in the sysroot is corrupted
23:58:47 < JaMa|Off> the problem is that if I go with PNBLACKLIST (to blacklist one from the conflicting duo) then I'm blacklisting something which alone is fine (unless you're building the other
recipe as well)
23:59:41 < JaMa|Off> e.g. Paul won't be happy if I blacklist modphp, just because it conflicts with php and vice-versa
00:20:27 < rburton> JaMa|Off: blacklisting both php and modphp is clearly the answer, and improves the world
00:22:43 < JaMa|Off> should I send patch for oe-core to blacklist xz and lzma as well? :)
You can still disable that PNBLACKLIST in your local.conf or distro.conf.
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 1:12 [oe-core][RFC][PATCH 1/3] gcr: blacklist because of conflict with gnome-keyring Martin Jansa
2014-10-07 1:12 ` [oe-core][RFC][PATCH 2/3] gnome-panel3, gnome-menus3, libgweather3: blacklist because of sysroot conflicts with 2* versions Martin Jansa
2014-10-07 1:12 ` [oe-core][RFC][PATCH 3/3] modphp: blacklist because of conflict with php Martin Jansa
2014-10-07 4:28 ` Martin Jansa
2014-10-07 4:53 ` [meta-oe][PATCHv2] modphp, xdebug: " Martin Jansa
2014-10-07 8:39 ` Paul Eggleton
2014-10-07 15:25 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2014-10-08 8:05 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141007152508.GD12322@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox