Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt

[Joe MacDonald <Joe_MacDonald@mentor.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5182 bytes --]

[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 16.04.11 (Mon 15:33) Mike Looijmans wrote:

> On 06-04-16 19:14, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> >Hi Mike,
> >
> >[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 16.04.05 (Tue 08:17) Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >
> >>Just a reminder that currently "waf" is broken and still won't work on
> >>mipsel platforms without this bugfix.
> >
> >I merged this for you and pushed it a few minutes ago.  I don't have any
> >MIPS hardware to test this on but I'm trusting that since you're
> >reporting it's a build failure that validating for the Edgerouter is a
> >valid test case.  Is that true?
> 
> Don't know that particular box,

It's the only MIPS machine I could find in meta-yocto-bsp.  I don't know
anything about it either.

> but if it failed to build (because it's mipsel and reports a missing
> file) before this patch, then yes, that's okay as a test.

Okay, let me know if something still seems busted and we'll try to turn
it around quickly for you.

-J.

> 
> M.
> 
> 
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>On 02-04-16 10:22, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >>>Apparently something was wrong in the patch "waf-cross-answers:
> >>>Add cross-answers-mipsel.txt". and it created a dead symlink.
> >>>Solve it by just copying the cross-answers-mips.txt instead of
> >>>linking it.
> >>>
> >>>Fixes: 0898fb01ccea229cb0c64796b62f20a7c596ac0b
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
> >>>---
> >>>  .../waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt     | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>  mode change 120000 => 100644 meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>deleted file mode 120000
> >>>index 59b4337..0000000
> >>>--- a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>+++ /dev/null
> >>>@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> >>>-cross-answers-mips.txt
> >>>diff --git a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>new file mode 100644
> >>>index 0000000..18bfa02
> >>>--- /dev/null
> >>>+++ b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> >>>+Checking uname sysname type: "Linux"
> >>>+Checking uname version type: "# Wed May 20 10:34:39 UTC 2015"
> >>>+Checking simple C program: "hello world"
> >>>+rpath library support: OK
> >>>+-Wl,--version-script support: OK
> >>>+Checking getconf LFS_CFLAGS: NO
> >>>+Checking correct behavior of strtoll: NO
> >>>+Checking for working strptime: OK
> >>>+Checking for C99 vsnprintf: "1"
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_SHARED_MMAP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_MREMAP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_GETIFADDRS: NO
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF: NO
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFREQ: NO
> >>>+Checking for large file support without additional flags: NO
> >>>+Checking for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_INCOHERENT_MMAP: NO
> >>>+Checking value of NSIG: "128"
> >>>+Checking value of _NSIG: "128"
> >>>+Checking value of SIGRTMAX: "127"
> >>>+Checking value of SIGRTMIN: "34"
> >>>+Checking whether the WRFILE -keytab is supported: OK
> >>>+Checking for kernel change notify support: OK
> >>>+Checking for Linux kernel oplocks: OK
> >>>+Checking for kernel share modes: OK
> >>>+Checking whether POSIX capabilities are available: OK
> >>>+Checking if can we convert from CP850 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >>>+Checking if can we convert from UTF-8 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >>>+vfs_fileid checking for statfs() and struct statfs.f_fsid: OK
> >>>+Checking whether we can use Linux thread-specific credentials: OK
> >>>+Checking whether fcntl locking is available: OK
> >>>+Checking for the maximum value of the 'time_t' type: NO
> >>>+Checking whether the realpath function allows a NULL argument: OK
> >>>+Checking for ftruncate extend: OK
> >>>+getcwd takes a NULL argument: OK
> >>>+Checking for small off_t: NO
> >>>+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 32 bit: NO
> >>>+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 64 bit: OK
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Kind regards,
> >>
> >>Mike Looijmans
> >>System Expert
> >>
> >>TOPIC Embedded Products
> >>Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> >>Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> >>Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> >>E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> >>Website: www.topicproducts.com
> >>
> >>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
> 
> TOPIC Embedded Products
> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]