From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (mail-yw0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE8F70178 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id a10so144945908ywa.3 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lH+tzjy3k3aBgDWL9yiH3ZQOjoHp5e339VBNIZzg0HY=; b=sKh79Rnhd7Q99C1bpBin511Ec3kTKxS4H/3HGciCp9wKViYQkH9eODe1Qi/EkS1zPJ yi7GAOvVt6APHlAn+BqOujErC2dyhnXqZ/acTBPEdjbt5CNRjpOyBi4fN6SKX3iTXGyP jmfrkBAcmA1BNK9pMtQfM6B3NBPRops1fQx88= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lH+tzjy3k3aBgDWL9yiH3ZQOjoHp5e339VBNIZzg0HY=; b=d1sVBisKvRhoZ9Aj6YY99ktJ+YX/Eo8m1uiWwYIlIJQWOd5458UfCAPihqXSi6h6yc rIkHa7DWESgT4q7OlZVcPcBXcPzaHL42KVncxdG/gBt5Cf8Jn3ZxZiPlMo6J/o4efcTK zDXNiqRwZfPh8FE1lVc9mnzPBMXAySVc6bw6dQcRt8FsfQ8Tmj27J06XPh1Eii/CIYgZ KtrYYTiY19uy72lrAWhAbuHfPQ2TfasKQuLDoOV4sO7txma7Ye/6DEq3RdZzx7HVqiJX RdKJQKJ7/eDv4CPe7UWePHrVI11SWoCyRoPDR+pTyra4ahcBb/q2/1WUa6FB+nXhzeSp Pd5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC020Dmds86IcCsMjRSRcLTOwh305NMyEtr2aMyme2nKEZMB6adQYjXzC0BT4ho4NcQ== X-Received: by 10.13.200.3 with SMTP id k3mr38627155ywd.173.1480452209790; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from bill-the-cat (cpe-75-180-228-133.ec.res.rr.com. [75.180.228.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m136sm22223152ywd.19.2016.11.29.12.43.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:43:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:43:27 -0500 From: Tom Rini To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20161129204327.GG2546@bill-the-cat> References: <4717571.f7GXZOAcRz@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4717571.f7GXZOAcRz@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patrick Ohly , Michael Halstead , Jose Lamego Subject: Re: meta-openembedded patchwork git hook X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:43:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:52:46AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi folks, > > Martin just brought to my attention that the git hook for the > meta-openembedded repository that's supposed to update patchwork still isn't > working and hasn't done so for a very long time. I thought we'd fixed this so > that merged patches get marked as "Accepted", but at least for meta- > openembedded it seems like that's not the case. > > Jose / Michael - can you look into this if you haven't already? Please let me > know if you need any help. Since I brought this up on IRC, I wanted to chime in here. First, if you want to use top-of-tree patchwork you'll also want to grab https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/stephenfin/post-receive%20fixes/ (and fwiw, I also have been setting the DJANGO part to 'dev' rather than production for my use-case). Second, I think part of the problem is that there are just some cases where the hashing fails, which for me is around 10% of the time. Depending on how much one uses bundles and tracks what ends up being committed this may or may not be a problem. And I'm sure upstream patchwork would appreciate any changes to improve hashing success :) -- Tom