From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: meta-browser duplicate patch
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:20:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112152009.GA15330@linux-uys3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8801566a-4012-0323-dc60-6833ab0079a7@linux.intel.com>
On Thu 2017-01-12 @ 04:59:20 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 01/12/2017 04:44 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Does the do_patch logic now ignore the same patch being applied twice? I was
> > quite sure this was a problem in the past (and if it isn't, maybe it should
> > be?)
> >
> > In commit fb4e542079958b6afde324a1e9bfdd695842aeeb
> > the patch recipes-browser/chromium/chromium/chromium/Do-not-depend-on-Linux-4.5.patch
> >
> > and in commit c6fc9da7be64af7cd08c2bbb026e4c3ffc760687
> > the patch recipes-browser/chromium/chromium/chromium/unset-madv-free.patch
> >
> > are exactly the same. Yet they're both happily applied without so much as a
> > warning, not even in temp/log.do_patch.
>
> Can you inspect the resulting file? Are the changes being applied twice in
> two *different* locations in the file?
Ah yes, there it is, applied twice:
44 #if OS(LINUX) && defined(MADV_FREE)
45 // Added in Linux 4.5, but it breaks the sandbox.
46 #undef MADV_FREE
47 #endif
48
49 #if OS(LINUX) && defined(MADV_FREE)
50 // Added in Linux 4.5, but we don't want to depend on 4.5 at runtime
51 #undef MADV_FREE
52 #endif
> We have a bug to fix this issue:
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Great, thanks :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 14:44 meta-browser duplicate patch Trevor Woerner
2017-01-12 14:59 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-01-12 15:20 ` Trevor Woerner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112152009.GA15330@linux-uys3 \
--to=twoerner@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox