Re: Before you ping some older patches

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1639 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:26:54PM +0000, MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> It might just be me, but the list in general has seemed a bit off since at least Monday. I have good reason to believe it has eaten at least two of my posts.

During OEDAM discussion I also had a feeling that both my replies to
"Splitting meta-oe?" thread were eaten by the ML gremlins, but both
appear at:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-February/thread.html
so that wasn't the case.

> On Feb 22, 2017 4:33 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Make sure they aren't already in master (or master-next), currently
> there is only one change in master-next:
> eb7979113 netcat-openbsd: fix implicit dependency on pkg-config
> 
> 2) Make sure there weren't some negative feedback comments on our change
> 
> 3) Make sure the change made it to patchwork, currently there is only
> one "open" change:
> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/137499/
> 
> Be aware that the changes are usually daily marked as archived, when
> they are sorted to corresponding bundles and included in master-next
> branch for testing, as described here:
> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same_oe_project_on_patchwork
> 
> I'm writing this, because currently many changes are missing on patchwork,
> because of some unknown issue with it, see:
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-February/111467.html
> once this issue is resolved, please re-send missing changes.
> 
> Regards,
> 

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]