From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com (mailout4.zoneedit.com [64.68.198.17]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473ED71CB3 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D800B208E3 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmo03-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYJoBv2S8RFC for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.denix.org (pool-100-15-85-143.washdc.fios.verizon.net [100.15.85.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF572208CB for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51A7816242A; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:30:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:30:53 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20170326203053.GH15664@denix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: [meta-qt5] qtwebkit 5.8 build issues? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:31:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I've been having the following build issues lately with qtwebkit 5.8 from master: | make[2]: Entering directory '/OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/build/Source' | rm -f libQt5WebKit.so.5.8.0 libQt5WebKit.so libQt5WebKit.so.5 libQt5WebKit.so.5.8 | linking ../lib/libQt5WebKit.so.5.8.0 | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `__bss_start' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `__bss_start' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_edata' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_edata' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_end' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Core.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_end' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Gui.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `__bss_start' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Gui.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_edata' | /OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libQt5Gui.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `_end' | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status | Makefile.api:92: recipe for target '../lib/libQt5WebKit.so.5.8.0' failed | make[2]: *** [../lib/libQt5WebKit.so.5.8.0] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory '/OE/master/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtwebkit/5.8.0+gitAUTOINC+74ac5b0f34-r0/build/Source' | Makefile.QtWebKit:44: recipe for target 'sub-api-pri-make_first-ordered' failed | make[1]: *** [sub-api-pri-make_first-ordered] Error 2 I believe I was able to build 5.8/master before, so I'm suspecting recent binutils upgrade... But I can be wrong. Would really appreciate some help here. Thanks. -- Denys