From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 481 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:37:06 UTC Received: from mail.dream-property.net (mail.dream-property.net [82.149.226.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18DE77E4D for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D12A31854C0 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5Fw2CP2v6u7J for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from t460p (p57A61659.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.166.22.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 095593180D3C for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:03 +0100 From: Andreas Oberritter To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20171205142903.6443ab7e@t460p> In-Reply-To: <1512466387-8999-1-git-send-email-zhengrq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1512466387-8999-1-git-send-email-zhengrq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [meta-networking][PATCH] packagegroup-samba: new add X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:37:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Zheng, On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:33:07 +0800 zhengrq wrote: > Add packagegroup for samba, for there are too many rpms in samba and it's hard to manage. > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin > --- > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb > > diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..6177691 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +SUMMARY = "samba package groups" > +PV = "1.0" > +PR = "r2" > + > +inherit packagegroup > + > +PROVIDES = "${PACKAGES}" > +PACKAGES = "${PN}-server ${PN}-client ${PN}-ctdb-tests ${PN}-pidl" > + > +SUMMARY_${PN}-client = " samba client" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-client = "\ > + smbclient \ > + samba-common \ > + winbind \ > + registry-tools \ > + " Why don't you just create a samba-client meta package inside the samba recipe instead? > + > +SUMMARY_${PN}-server = " samba server" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-server = "\ > + samba \ > + samba-common \ > + " All samba libraries already depend on samba-common, so samba depends on it indirectly. Therefore this "package group" doesn't seem to be necessary. > + > +SUMMARY_${PN}-ctdb-tests = " samba ctdb-tests" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-ctdb-tests = "samba-ctdb-tests" > + > +SUMMARY_${PN}-pidl = "samba-pidl" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-pidl = "samba-pidl" These two seem to be unnecessary, too. Regards, Andreas