Re: cppzmq: 4.2.3 update

[Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>]

On 01/03/18 16:36 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> 
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:16:04 -0500
> Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > ---
> >  meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > index a64745c94..9e8ad5151 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ LICENSE = "MIT"
> >  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=db174eaf7b55a34a7c89551197f66e94"
> >  DEPENDS = "zeromq"
> >  
> > -SRCREV = "68a7b09cfce01c4c279fba2cf91686fcfc566848"
> > -PV = "4.1.5+git${SRCPV}"
> > +PV = "4.2.3"
> > +SRCREV = "v${PV}"
> 
> we usually don't use tags in SRCREV, because tags may change over time, and
> therefore bitbake has to query the server each time it parses the recipe, IIRC.

Ok.  Should I submit a v2 with the file rename that akuster808 suggested and
pulling a tarball instead?


-- 
Justin Bronder