From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
To: OpenEmbedded Devel List <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe?
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:50:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180317035021.GA19189@linux-uys3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519170075.24236.345.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
On Tue 2018-02-20 @ 11:41:15 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The separate layers and maintainership is the way we designed the new
> layered approach to OE to scale.
I only became an active user of OE after the OE-classic split; I had used it a
couple times during the OE-classic era, but not very deeply. Therefore: my
apologies for not having a fuller understanding of the issue(s).
Would anyone like to make an honest, unbiased attempt at answering:
1. What problem(s) was the post-OE-classic split attempting to solve?
2. Did it work? Can it be said that the problem(s) the OE-split was attempting
to solve, have actually been solved by the split? (and, if new problems
arose as a result of this split, were they small an manageable relative to
the pre-split problems?)
The experiment to decide whether we need more splits or consolidation has
already been done. Have the results been sufficiently understood?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-17 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 10:45 Splitting meta-oe? Burton, Ross
2018-02-20 14:15 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-20 16:50 ` akuster808
2018-02-20 17:13 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-20 18:52 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-21 0:51 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 8:49 ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21 9:06 ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21 9:48 ` Andrea Adami
2018-02-21 10:22 ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21 14:02 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 14:14 ` Burton, Ross
2018-02-21 14:58 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-21 15:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 19:33 ` Andreas Oberritter
2018-02-22 9:18 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-21 14:20 ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:44 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 13:34 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:38 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:45 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 13:55 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:59 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-20 17:46 ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 18:00 ` Tim Orling
2018-02-20 18:28 ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-20 18:40 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 18:52 ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 19:15 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 21:55 ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 22:27 ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-20 23:17 ` Andreas Müller
2018-02-20 23:41 ` Richard Purdie
2018-03-17 3:50 ` Trevor Woerner [this message]
2018-03-17 14:23 ` Philip Balister
2018-03-18 5:49 ` Trevor Woerner
2018-02-21 0:07 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 0:10 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 13:57 ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 14:48 ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:09 ` Martin Hundebøll
2018-02-22 6:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2018-02-22 9:27 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-22 9:40 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 15:54 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-20 20:32 ` akuster808
2018-02-20 19:06 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 16:54 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2018-02-20 18:49 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-28 17:17 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-02-28 21:33 ` Andreas Müller
2018-03-01 1:20 ` akuster808
2018-03-01 8:46 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01 1:17 ` akuster808
2018-03-01 9:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01 18:44 ` akuster808
2018-03-01 18:46 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01 22:11 ` Bruce Ashfield
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-17 17:07 Burton, Ross
2017-02-17 17:24 ` Andreas Müller
2017-02-17 18:02 ` Martin Jansa
2017-02-17 18:28 ` Joe MacDonald
2017-02-17 19:45 ` Philip Balister
2017-02-20 3:31 ` Richard Purdie
2017-02-20 4:28 ` Joe MacDonald
2017-02-20 11:18 ` Martin Jansa
2017-02-22 16:15 ` akuster808
2017-02-17 20:54 ` Andreas Müller
2017-02-18 21:35 ` Burton, Ross
2017-02-17 21:55 ` akuster808
2017-02-18 0:53 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180317035021.GA19189@linux-uys3 \
--to=twoerner@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox