From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
openembedded-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:10:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24887939.8KrA2KDk4J@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130516085954.GC24809@jama.dyndns-home.com>
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.
> >
> > With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make removing
> > layers a problem?
>
> Does PR service really fix removing layers? I don't think so, if you add
> layer and checksum of foo is changed AUTOPR is incremented, but then you
> remove the layer and the checksum is unfortunately the same as what you
> had before AUTOPR will go backwards.
Then I would have to say if that's not the behaviour you want we should change
it or at least make it optional to force it to always increment even if the
checksum is the same as a previous value.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-14 7:36 [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends Koen Kooi
2013-05-15 14:44 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 6:31 ` Koen Kooi
2013-05-16 8:29 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 8:59 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2013-05-16 9:10 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-05-16 9:29 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-16 20:15 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-15 20:33 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-15 23:02 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-22 8:47 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-22 9:17 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2013-05-22 10:08 ` Paul Eggleton
[not found] ` <1369217654.6695.62.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign>
2013-05-23 2:50 ` Chris Larson
2013-05-27 12:07 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-16 6:23 ` Koen Kooi
2013-05-16 8:37 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 9:27 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24887939.8KrA2KDk4J@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox