From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmrtw-00022k-TX for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:12:03 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2012 11:57:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,343,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="269157978" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.19]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2012 11:57:08 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:57:06 +0000 Message-ID: <3012778.0fGtJNS4Ad@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.3 (Linux/3.5.0-21-generic; KDE/4.9.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20121220140211.GO14543@jama.palm1.palmone.com> References: <20121220133018.GJ14543@jama.palm1.palmone.com> <20121220133307.GK14543@jama.palm1.palmone.com> <20121220140211.GO14543@jama.palm1.palmone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-webserver] patches on patchwork X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:12:04 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 20 December 2012 15:02:11 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:33:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Hi, can you check and update patche in meta-webserver bundle? > > http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-webserver/?archive=both I didn't comment at the time but I don't particularly like this patch - I didn't see this error and if it is present, I don't think this is the right way to fix it - it should be fixed in the makefile surely... > I've forgot to mention there is also one in meta-opie and one in > meta-handheld > > http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handheld/?archive=both This has already been applied, I have marked it as such. > http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/?archive=both Half of this has been superseded (the addition of MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS - now we just add packagegroup-base) and for ensuring that the kernel image is within the rootfs, the machine config should be adding kernel-image to MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS. I discussed this with Denis at the time, so I've marked it as rejected. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre