Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@ge.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Supported Python version for OE?
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:23:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE91403.9080001@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273507486.2994.189.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Joshua Lock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question, (perhaps for the TSC?):
>
> 	"What's the minimum Python version we want to support in OE?"
>
> According to the wiki we support Python 2.4 and above but I wonder if
> people have any thoughts with regards to bumping it?
>   

I'd suggest that the better question to ask is:

     "Which versions of which distros do we currently intend OE to work on?"

Given that the revisions of Python for the following distributions are
as follows:

Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - 2.6.5
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS - 2.5.2

Debian lenny (stable) - 2.5.2
Debian squeeze (testing) - 2.5.3
Debian sid (unstable) - 2.5.4
Debian etch (oldstable) - 2.4.4

Fedora 12 - 2.6.2
Fedora 11 - 2.6
Fedora 10 - 2.5.2
Fedora 9 - 2.5.1
Fedora 8 - 2.5.1
Fedora 7 - 2.5
Fedora 6 - 2.4.3

RHEL6 (beta) - 2.6.2
RHEL5 - 2.4.3

OpenSUSE 11.2 - 2.6.2
OpenSUSE 11.1 - 2.6.0
OpenSUSE 11.0 - 2.5.2

This would suggest that using 2.5 features should be ok for the majority
of people. My one area of concern would be those using RHEL. RHEL 6
isn't out yet and v.5 uses 2.4.3 - this wouldn't impact me, so I'm not
overly fussed.

> The reason I ask is because I had a user contact me about using Python
> 2.5 features (str.partition) in relocatable.bbclass, I hadn't even
> noticed this and seems like not many others have but it's clearly
> affecting at least one person.
>
> I have a pretty trivial (if ugly) patch to work around this, but it
> raised an interesting question so I thought I'd ask that before sending
> the patch.
>   

The only other question I can think of is "is there an advantage to
using the Python 2.5 features?".

Martyn
> Cheers,
> Joshua
>   


-- 
Martyn Welch (Principal Software Engineer)   |   Registered in England and
GE Intelligent Platforms                     |   Wales (3828642) at 100
T +44(0)127322748                            |   Barbirolli Square, Manchester,
E martyn.welch@ge.com                        |   M2 3AB  VAT:GB 927559189




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-10 16:04 Supported Python version for OE? Joshua Lock
2010-05-10 16:50 ` Khem Raj
2010-05-11  8:23 ` Martyn Welch [this message]
2010-05-12 10:23   ` Joshua Lock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE91403.9080001@ge.com \
    --to=martyn.welch@ge.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox