From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJRNU-0002qg-LA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:19:33 +0200 Received: (qmail 89 invoked by uid 1003); 1 Jun 2010 13:15:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 13:15:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4C0507DF.8080707@balister.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:15:11 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C04F6FD.4070804@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4C04F6FD.4070804@mlbassoc.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Is Angstrom dead? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:19:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2010 08:03 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > It sure feels like it :-( More that the core Angstrom devs are really popular people so we have lots of work at the moment. Philip > > For a week, I've been trying to build various images in Angstrom > and the problems I've faced have gone totally unanswered on either > the Angstrom or OE mailing lists. I'm not the only one facing > these problems either. > > I'm mostly interested in building beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image > which [at least] implies it should be a great demo to show at > LinuxTag (which starts in only a few days now). Surely a show > piece would be something that a popular project would want to > support and be available to the masses?? > > I tried again today, updating to org.openembedded.dev branch, > commit a2834c64fb3ed535fca51c25547754fa907e4ca5 Sadly, new > problems (and probably still the old ones) remain: > > | checking for CHEESE... configure: error: Package requirements ( > glib-2.0 >= 2.16.0 gobject-2.0 >= 2.12.0 gio-2.0 >= 2.16.0 gtk+-2.0 >= > 2.19.1 gdk-2.0 >= 2.14.0 gnome-desktop-2.0 >= 2.26.0 gconf-2.0 >= 2.16.0 > gstreamer-0.10 >= 0.10.23 gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10 >= 0.10.23 cairo > >= 1.4.0 dbus-1 >= 1.0 dbus-glib-1 >= 0.7 pangocairo >= 1.18.0 > librsvg-2.0 >= 2.18.0 > | libcanberra-gtk gudev-1.0) were not met: > | > | No package 'gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10' found > | > | Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > | installed software in a non-standard prefix. > | > | Alternatively, you may set the environment variables CHEESE_CFLAGS > | and CHEESE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > | See the pkg-config man page for more details. > | > NOTE: package cheese-2.30.1-r0: task do_configure: Failed > > Nothing special - out of the box config file with > MACHINE="beagleboard" > DISTRO="angstrom-2008.1" >