From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([76.76.67.137] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJScL-0001l8-49 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:39:03 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 2AA0216607A4; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:34:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7DA16607A1; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:34:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C051A83.6070601@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:34:43 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C04F6FD.4070804@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.76.67.137 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gary@mlbassoc.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: Discussion of the angstrom distribution development Subject: Re: Is Angstrom dead? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:39:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2010 08:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> I tried again today, updating to org.openembedded.dev branch, >> commit a2834c64fb3ed535fca51c25547754fa907e4ca5 Sadly, new >> problems (and probably still the old ones) remain: >> >> | checking for CHEESE... configure: error: Package requirements ( glib-2.0>= >> 2.16.0 gobject-2.0>= 2.12.0 gio-2.0>= 2.16.0 gtk+-2.0>= 2.19.1 >> gdk-2.0>= 2.14.0 gnome-desktop-2.0>= 2.26.0 gconf-2.0>= 2.16.0 >> gstreamer-0.10>= 0.10.23 gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10>= 0.10.23 cairo>= >> 1.4.0 dbus-1>= 1.0 dbus-glib-1>= 0.7 pangocairo>= 1.18.0 librsvg-2.0 >>> = 2.18.0 >> | libcanberra-gtk gudev-1.0) were not met: >> | >> | No package 'gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10' found >> | >> | Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you >> | installed software in a non-standard prefix. >> | >> | Alternatively, you may set the environment variables CHEESE_CFLAGS >> | and CHEESE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. >> | See the pkg-config man page for more details. >> | >> NOTE: package cheese-2.30.1-r0: task do_configure: Failed > > now i'm slightly confused since neither ubuntu or fedora appear to > have any pkgconfig info for the cheese package, so why would there be > a test for it that you would need to override? or is this not > pkgconfig-related? I've no idea - all I was pointing out is that as of this morning, there's a new failure... -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------