From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([76.76.67.137] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONQhB-0004BH-H3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:24:27 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 57B5016606B5; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:19:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E8516606A7; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:19:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C13897C.3080603@mlbassoc.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:19:56 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4BFE5402.8030607@mlbassoc.com> <4BFFAC85.9000008@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.76.67.137 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gary@mlbassoc.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: Jacinto Alvarez Subject: Re: Problems building Angstrom images X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:24:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/12/2010 06:37 AM, Jacinto Alvarez wrote: > Gary Thomas mlbassoc.com> writes: > > >>>> To be clear, I'm building >>>> MACHINE="beagleboard" >>>> DISTRO="angstrom-2008.1" >>>> >>> >>> You got any help with this yet Gary? >>> I just replied here as it was the only >>> similar error i could find >> >> I have seen no replies to this problem, sorry. I *would* >> really like to see it fixed > > + one more facing the same issue :( > Still no hints as to how to fix this? What sort of problem are you seeing? What I found was that the 'encodings*' packages seem to have been built (the stamps were there), but there were no .ipk packages for them. I simply forced them to rebuild and all started working. % bitbake encodings -c clean % bitbake encodings % bitbake beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------