From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxy.dresearch.de ([87.193.137.100] helo=mail.dresearch.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORJHs-0002mo-AQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:18:16 +0200 Received: from exchange.intern.dresearch.de (unknown [192.168.32.16]) by mail.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68441491284 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:13:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.32.10.2]) by exchange.intern.dresearch.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:13:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4C21A61E.6040304@dresearch.de> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:13:50 +0200 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1277201329-1339-1-git-send-email-sledz@dresearch.de> <4C20A60D.40102@dresearch.de> <111b01cb123e$c90177a0$5b0466e0$@Distant-earth.com> In-Reply-To: <111b01cb123e$c90177a0$5b0466e0$@Distant-earth.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jun 2010 06:13:42.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[3AB8EDE0:01CB129B] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.193.137.100 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sledz@dresearch.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev/mount.sh: try to kill active processes before umount X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:18:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 22.06.2010 21:11, schrieb John Willis: > There is little harm in a umount -l in the short term. OK, i've prepared a new patch for this. Because i forgot the --in-reply-to it started a new thread. Sorry. Steffen