Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Schuster <thebohemian@gmx.net>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: MULTIMACHINE builds and PACKAGE_ARCH=all recipes
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:09:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5990C1.8050302@gmx.net> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1479 bytes --]

Hi,
I am in the process of updating the java recipes to use
BBCLASSEXTEND="native" and fixing the do_stage use. However now I hit a
problem because of a workaround which was added months ago to install
Java libraries (jars) into one common directory in a multimachine build.
This workaround was *additionally* specifically added to the angstrom
2008 distribution.

The problem that people wanted to solve was that in a multimachine build
the installation of a PACKAGE_ARCH="all" recipe was only being done once
and so from the 2nd machine onwards the build process was unable to
access the jars.

For me I always wondered how it is for python, C# or perl
programs/libraries which we provide and why there is no problem with
them. As it looks they go the simple way and simply do not appear to
have set PACKAGE_ARCH="all".

So for now I see 2 solutions for the Java recipes:
1) Java packages do not appear as arch-independent anymore.
2) Bitbake (or OE) should be taught to install an arch dependent package
into all sysroots of a multimachine build.

The former is quickly done because most recipes use java-library.bbclass
but I find this technically wrong somehow (it also slows down everyone's
multimachine builds considerably).

I don't know how difficult or feasible it is to implement the 2nd option
(Bitbake gods anyone?) or whether there might even be a third option.

I only know that the shit has hit the fan ... :-/

Regards
Robert


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 270 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-04 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-04 16:09 Robert Schuster [this message]
2010-08-04 19:44 ` MULTIMACHINE builds and PACKAGE_ARCH=all recipes Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5990C1.8050302@gmx.net \
    --to=thebohemian@gmx.net \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox