Re: What to do about the poor bitbake Quality Control?

[Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@ge.com>]

On 17/08/10 16:02, Cliff Brake wrote:
> I think it would be very useful to have a "stable" branch that is only
> synchronised with dev when X number of targets build from a clean
> build.  It seems like this would be high value, with little effort.
> Of course there will be corner things that break, but at least a new
> beagleboard user can check out something and have reasonable
> confidence that it will build images.
>
> Does anyone have suggestions for the branch name and a reasonable
> subset of machines and build targets?  Perhaps someone is already
> running these clean builds?  At one point we had a machine at OSUOSL
> dedicated to this purpose, but no one ever set it up.
>

So something like Debian's stable, testing and unstable[1]?

Martyn

[1] http://www.debian.org/releases/


-- 
Martyn Welch (Principal Software Engineer)   |   Registered in England and
GE Intelligent Platforms                     |   Wales (3828642) at 100
T +44(0)127322748                            |   Barbirolli Square, 
Manchester,
E martyn.welch@ge.com                        |   M2 3AB  VAT:GB 927559189