From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gravedo.de ([85.214.79.159]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7ucR-0004E3-Dn for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:39:35 +0200 Received: by gravedo.de (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 41EB3275CE2F; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:39:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.142] (p5489BE68.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.190.104]) by gravedo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53805275CE43 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CBC9444.5090801@gravedo.de> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:39:00 +0200 From: Simon Busch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12pre) Gecko/20101011 Shredder/3.1.6pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1287123859-31756-1-git-send-email-morphis@gravedo.de> <4CB8855F.4090304@gravedo.de> In-Reply-To: <4CB8855F.4090304@gravedo.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.214.79.159 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: morphis@gravedo.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] python-pycairo: convert to new style staging and bump PR X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:39:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 15.10.2010 18:46, Simon Busch wrote: > On 15.10.2010 09:07, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Some concerns: >> I don't think STAGING_INCDIR should be used; guess it should go to >> ${D}/${includedir} (just like the 1.8.0 version does). >> You might also peek at the do_install_append of the 1.8.0 recipe as it >> does different/more things. I don't know too much about pycairo, but I >> can imagine these make sense for 1.4.0 too. > > I even don't know much about pycairo in detail I just noted that it does > not compile in its current state and changed it to new style staging. > But I will check if it makes more sense to change the staging path to > ${D}/${includedir} as I just copied what was already there in do_stage(). > >> Then again perhaps it is time to move to 1.8.0; this version has a >> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE of -1, but angstrom 2008 and 2010 and kaeilos >> already have 1.8.0 as preferred version (and the 1.8.0 version is >> around for 1.5 year or so). > > For me it should be ok to drop 1.4.0 and use 1.8.0 if nobody else uses > it. Btw. there is already a newer version of pycairo available. It's > 1.8.10 but they changed it's name to py2cairo. pycairo is now the name > for the version with python 3.x support. As SHR is now using 1.8.0 as default python-pycairo version I am fine with dropping version 1.4.0. regards, morphis