From: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] epiphany-2.30.2: unbreak do_configure by setting ca-file path
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:07:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC5731F.2030009@dresearch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288006635.3793.38.camel@mattotaupa>
Am 25.10.2010 13:37, schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Montag, den 25.10.2010, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Steffen Sledz:
>> * Disable existence check for ca-bundle file in configure.ac because
>> it does not work in OE cross compile environment (location at build
>> host may differ from location at target).
>> * Explicitely set ca-bundle file path according to the one used by
>> ca-certificates package.
>> ...
>> ++# disable this check because it does not work in all environments
>> ++# (location at build host may differ from target)
>> ++# if ! test -f "$with_ca_file"; then
>> ++# AC_MSG_ERROR([No such file '$with_ca_file'. Use --with-ca-file=path to set, or --without-ca-file to disable])
>> ++# fi
>
> Would adding the following check also work?
>
> if test "$cross_compiling" != "yes"; then
> …
> fi
I don't think this is a good idea. It is not a problem of cross compiling. Cross compiling is just one case where it occurs.
Also if i build for the same architecture it is not a good idea to check for the existence of a file *at buildtime* and compile this path into the binary.
The existence of such a file should be checked and handled at runtime only.
> I think this would be more portable. Could you report that issue
> upstream too please.
I'll try.
Steffen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-14 21:56 testing branch 2010-10-14 Cliff Brake
2010-10-15 10:21 ` Cliff Brake
2010-10-16 7:24 ` Petr Štetiar
2010-10-19 6:21 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-19 11:06 ` Cliff Brake
2010-10-19 11:13 ` Koen Kooi
2010-10-17 12:27 ` testing branch 2010-10-14 - configure epiphany still fails Sledz, Steffen
2010-10-20 11:08 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-10-20 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] ca-certificates: unbreak do_configure of packages depending on ca-bundle.pem Steffen Sledz
2010-10-21 9:59 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2010-10-20 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] epiphany-2.30.2: unbreak do_configure by setting ca-file path Steffen Sledz
2010-10-21 9:14 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-10-21 9:54 ` Holger Freyther
2010-10-21 12:11 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-10-23 12:27 ` Sledz, Steffen
2010-10-25 9:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Steffen Sledz
2010-10-25 10:03 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-10-25 11:37 ` Paul Menzel
2010-10-25 12:07 ` Steffen Sledz [this message]
2010-10-25 15:36 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-10-25 18:02 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC5731F.2030009@dresearch.de \
--to=sledz@dresearch.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox